Champions Trophy 2017

Call it ‘Champions ka World Cup’ all you like, but the Champions Trophy is a meaningless tournament

Don’t dilute the World Cup.

Really, what is the point of cricket’s Champions Trophy?

It is a question which you are unlikely to hear presently. Not when the top eight cricketing nations have converged in the United Kingdom, just a few days away from the 2017 edition. Not when all players have turned up at pressers, expressing how excited they are to be playing the tournament.

But, shock and horror, it wasn’t too long ago when it was the Board of Control for Cricket in India (yes, the same ones who mulled a boycott of this edition) publicly shared similar sentiments.

“We want the tournament to be taken off the calendar in future,” the BCCI had said in 2006, unhappy at having to host the tournament that year. “The tournament is a financial burden on the country which hosts it. The ICC should organise just one main event, the World Cup, in an already overcrowded calendar.”

Unsurprisingly, the BCCI’s main bone of contention then was that they were forced to host and play in an ICC tournament when they could make much more money through bilateral series. Eleven years later, much water may have flown under the bridge, but that did not stop the BCCI from attempting to use the Champions Trophy again as a bargaining chip. Food for thought: if this was a World Cup, would the BCCI still have talked about a pullout?

World Cup or Champions Trophy?

But coming back to the original question that was raised in 2006. Amidst the glowing previews and the warm-ups, here is an important question: what is the point of this Champions Trophy?

Is the tournament supposed to crown the world champions, the undisputed rockstars of the One-Day International format? No, not really. That honour goes to the much-maligned World Cup, last held in 2015. So then, why have all the top eight nations come together to play in a tournament called the “Champions” Trophy no less?

Funnily enough, this year’s edition wasn’t even supposed to be held. The 2013 tournament was supposed to be the last one, with the Champions Trophy being replaced by a World Test Championship in 2017. But pressure from broadcasters won in the end and here we are again, back to play out a “mini World Cup” two years on from the actual one. It’s likely to continue as well – India is slated to host the 2021 edition.

Where’s the context?

For all the criticism it faces about overlong scheduled and flawed formats, the World Cup, as it deserves to be, is an iconic fixture in the cricket calendar. There is history about the event and a deep regard for feats achieved in the tournament. Think some of the biggest names in recent history: Clive Lloyd, Viv Richards, Sachin Tendulkar, Arjuna Ranatunga, MS Dhoni…and there’s an ever-lasting memory associated with them.

And it’s not just the big names. The World Cup is often criticised for being diluted due to the large number of non-Test playing nations, but sometimes they are the ones who provide the most heart-warming moments. Sri Lanka’s win over India in 1979. Kenya dismissing West Indies for 93 in 1996. Kenya reaching the semis in 2003. Bangladesh beating India in 2007. The joyous Ireland story.

In contrast, what do you remember from the Champions Trophy? Do you remember who won it in 2006? Or that it was held in 2009? Australia won both times, by the way.

It’s a sentiment which Ravi Shastri, a man hardly known for being diplomatic, shares. “Which event has so many world champions? What do you need Champions Trophy for? What are you trying to prove? Who remembers (who won them in the past)?” he asked, recently.

There’s the fanciful notion that the Champions Trophy is more competitive than the World Cup because it has the top-eight ranked teams. That is true, but the tournament takes it to another extreme, making it a lottery. Win four games and you win the tournament. Lose a game, or heaven forbid, have a match washed out, and you go home, left high and dry.

Don’t dilute the World Cup

The tournament was originally conceived in 1998 by the late Jagmohan Dalmiya to generate funds for associate cricket nations. The first two editions were held in Bangladesh and Kenya. Now, it’s become a meaningless tournament to add to the already busy schedule cricketers experience. And of course, another chance for the ICC to schedule as many India-Pakistan matches as possible.

This is not a typical leftist attack on capitalist revenue mongering. For cricket to be a global, international sport, finances and money are richly required. The ICC has, in recent times, taken laudatory moves towards providing context to an increasingly sterile global game with their Test Championship and ODI league proposals.

Now, they need to take that spirit of reform further. Have one flagship, iconic event for each format and build your sport around that. The World Twenty20 is fine, and there was talk of having a World Test Championship. The World Cup has been already been trimmed down to 10 teams. So why have another tournament with just two fewer teams? Scrap the Champions Trophy. As Shastri would say, cricket may well be the “real winner” as a result.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

The best preparation for business school from Harvard Business School

Get ready for your MBA, wherever you are going.

Getting accepted to a top-tier B-school seems like an achievement, which it is, but it’s only the beginning. The real grind comes after, once the program has begun. The very aspects that make an MBA education so valuable – high caliber classmates, a variety of business subjects, highly skilled and demanding professors, massive amounts of learning – also make it challenging. Additionally, the pace of learning can seem daunting. A preparatory course that teaches the fundamentals of business can alleviate the pressure and set students up for success. It can also help students make the most of their time at B-school, learning from all stimuli rather than struggling to catch up with the basics.

CORe (Credential of Readiness), a program offered by HBX, the online learning platform of Harvard Business School (HBS), does exactly this. CORe offers a comprehensive portfolio of essential preparatory courses in Accounting, Analytics, and Economics – grounded in real world problem solving and delivered via a highly-engaging online platform, to make business school aspirants ‘MBA-ready’.

Is it for you? 

Entrants to MBA programs come from diverse educational backgrounds and work experience. The difference between what an engineer, doctor, lawyer, commerce graduate, humanities graduate or chartered accountant studies is huge. Yet, in B-school, they are taught in one class and compete on the same turf. The CORe program is for students / professionals who may have never learned, or don’t feel at home with, business fundamentals. It is also valuable for people who have studied business but perhaps need a refresher before stepping back into a classroom environment.

Designed as a primer, CORe integrates the essential aspects of business thinking into three courses – ‘Business Analytics’, ‘Economics for Managers’ and ‘Financial Accounting’. These are the three classes that Harvard Business School faculty determined were essential to success in an MBA program and in the business world. Business Analytics, for example, trains students in quantitative methods used to analyze data. This is especially useful for students from humanities courses or professional courses that had limited application of mathematics, statistics and quantitative concepts. Delving into areas such as describing and summarizing data, sampling and estimation, hypothesis testing and regression, it initiates students into the MBA mode of applying mathematical and statistical principles to understanding and solving real life business situations.

HBX Platform | Courses offered in the HBX CORe program
HBX Platform | Courses offered in the HBX CORe program

Economics is the foundation of several business aspects such as customer demand, supplier cost, pricing, market dynamics, and competition. Through the Economics for Managers course, students learn to not only understand economic principles, but also use economics as a way of thinking and decision-making, in the context of business. Prof. Bharat Anand, Faculty Chair, HBX says, “We want to have you see and appreciate where and how companies get it right, where they use economic logic in powerful ways, and where they can sometimes fall into decision-making traps. This is a course that we, at HBS, want every one of our students to master before they enter our MBA program.”

The third course, Financial Accounting, is designed for students who do not have a business or accounting background. It teaches financial accounting, the backbone of all businesses, from the ground up. Students need a strong understanding of financial statements even for subjects such as Operations Management and Strategy. Since the course is taught through the case-based method with real business scenarios rather than plain theory, it can be a real eye-opener. Says Amita Metkari, Mechanical Engineer, looking to pursue an MBA, “The CORe platform is riveting. Cogent design and presentation of the platform has helped me get over my bias of subjects like accounting being dull, so much so that reading articles online about a company’s cash flow statements or analyzing a balance sheet has become my happiness fix.”

The HBS teaching method using a powerful virtual learning platform  

HBX blends the tenets of the HBS classroom pedagogy with the power of technology to offer immersive and challenging self-paced learning experiences through its interactive virtual learning platform. What makes it fun and effective is that the platform and the courses are designed for real-world problem-solving, active learning, and social learning.

Real-world business scenarios are posed to students to solve, and they learn the theory inductively. Students have real profiles and get to know their classmates, as the platform enables peer-to-peer networking and collaborative learning. Frequent reflections and interactive activities necessitate attentiveness and encourage knowledge sharing and active discussion between students. While HBX courses are self-paced; participants are required to meet weekly deadlines. This helps keep the cohort, a class of typically 300 students, on track and supports the social elements of the learning experience.

Play

CORe is offered throughout the year with durations ranging from 8 to 17 weeks. Each program length teaches the same content, but allows students to choose the time intensity that suits them. Applicants can also choose cohorts that provide the credit option of CORe, which will earn them eight undergraduate credits from Harvard Extension School or Harvard Summer School. Upon successful completion of the program, including passing an in-person final exam, students receive a Credential of Readiness from HBX and Harvard Business School. Students may also receive an official-grade transcript, and are invited to the annual on-campus HBX ConneXt event to meet peers from around the world, hear from faculty, and experience the HBS campus near Cambridge. Applicants to Harvard Business School can include CORe course credential in the application, but this will be considered in the larger context of a holistic selection process.

Interested candidates submit a free, 10-15-minute application by the deadlines noted on the HBX website. For more information and frequently asked questions, please review the HBX website.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of HBX and not by the Scroll editorial team.