Women's World Cup 2017

In knockout match against New Zealand, India showed what ‘intent’ means on a cricket field

Mithali Raj and Co outplayed the White Ferns by a massive a 186-run margin to book a place in the semifinals.

“They need to show positive intent with the bat.”

“The match was drawn but the team showed the right intent.”

“The field placement lacked proper intent.”

“Intent”, in cricket, is a term often used but rarely explicable. A largely intangible concept – you can express it on field and talk about in the commentary box, but it does not very well translate to words or images.

But in their last league game at the Women’s World Cup, facing New Zealand in a winner-takes-all clash, India made the abstract “intent” visible with their superlative performance. In no circumstance would playing the higher-ranked formidable White Ferns be easy, a team led by Suzie Bates, the ICC Women’s ODI and T20I Player of the Year.

But it was especially hard for India coming off two big, back-to-back losses and having to bounce back in a high-pressure game. It was an enormous task, one that even captain Mithali Raj was candid about.

“India has always had the problem that when faced with the crunch matches, the team does not necessarily step up,” she had said after the abject eight-wicket loss to Australia in the last game. “The girls are so talented, but it’s just a matter of how well they pull themselves up after a defeat. That’s what makes world champions.”

But on Saturday, as India outplayed the Kiwis in every department to set up the massive a 186-run win, it became clear that this Indian team possesses that champion mentality that the captain mentioned. They stepped up, they pulled themselves together and the pressure only raised their performance level.

And in this knockout match that lasted a mere 75 overs, the Indian team illustrated what exactly the abstract “intent” means on a cricket field.

Intent was Mithali Raj handing the Rajeshwari Gayakwad her first match of tournament ahead of the experienced Ekta Bisht.

Intent was Gayakwad picking up a fifer on her World Cup debut.

Intent was Raj coming in at No 3 after another early wicket, but not sacrificing her strike-rate this time.
Intent was Harmapnreet Kaur’s swift running between the wickets that kept the scoring rate ticking.

Intent was Veda Krishnamurthy blasting her way to an stunning 70 off 45 without pausing to let the bowlers settle.

Intent was Jhulan Goswami alertly picking a return catch on her bowling follow-through.

Intent was Deepti Sharma running backwards and diving to pouch a stunning low catch.

Intent was keeping a slip in the slog overs to pile on the pressure.

Intent was the intensity with which India played the crunch game they were expected to capitulate in.

Call it intent, or resilience or character or fearlessness, this positive approach to the match even after losing toss, early wickets, a rain interruption is what made the difference in the end. And the result was there for all to see – a semi-final berth knocking a top-three team out.

Individual brilliance, collective effort

Throughout the World Cup, one of the things that had troubled India was the otherwise prolific batting unit not clicking together. One or two batter made big scores, but were ably not supported by the rest. A crucial wicket triggered collapses. Case in point: Punam Raut hit a fluent ton against Australia, but India scored only 226.

But on a day when not only Smriti Mandhana – whose strange slump after two impressive innings continues – but even Raut fell early, the onus was on the middle order to take up charge. A middle order that has not had enough match time this World Cup. A middle order that would have to play the bulk of the Powerplay. But Raj, who came in in the fourth over, and Harmanpreet , who had to walk in the eight, were up for it.

In turn, the Indian captain played both aggressor and sheet anchor as she played a free-flowing knocks with a strike rate never dipping the way it did against Australia. Raj was ccriticised for her overtly watchful batting in her 114-ball 69 the last game and her positive approach made sure that would not happen again.

En route her sixth ODI century – and first in three years – she formed two vital, 100-plus partnerships with Harmanpreet Kaur and Veda Krishnamurthy. Two vastly different stands in terms of approach, but each as effective is sealing India’s win. These three batters facing the bulk of the balls, batted responsibly and riskily as the moment allowed, supported each other, ran quick singles when the gaps weren’t available, and scored a well-balanced 266.

When India lost two wickets in the first two overs of the Batting Powerplay – Harmanpreet and Deepti Sharma –in walked Veda Krishnamurthy who went on to play a stunner of an innings that will be remembered for a long time: 70 runs from just 45 balls. A strike rate of 155. Seven fours. Two clean sixes. The fastest fifty by an Indian cricketer in a Woman’s World Cup.

Krishnamurthy is a fine example of the remarkable resolve India have displayed in this match. She was dropped after inconsistent performances but came back into the team for the match against Sri Lanka, and admitted that staying out of the team wasn’t easy. But as her blinder, that turned the momentum India’s way by the end of the first half showed, this gritty Indian team is making a habit out of bouncing back from disappointment.

In a potentially shaky chase, the bowling also stuck to plan for India.

Brought in a crunch game, Gayakwad bettered India’s best figures this World Cup – Ekta Bisht’s 5/18 against Pakistan – with her 5/15. But much before she came to bowl, India’s pace duo of Jhulan Goswami and Shikha Pandey, bowling in rare tandem, had reduced the Kiwis to 7/2 using the movement the pitch offered. India’s pacers have not got long spells from both ends often this World Cup, but when they, both made the most of it by tying own the high-flying White Ferns.

The versatile Deepti Sharma, only 18, didn’t do anything with the bat but was her usual lethal self with the ball finishing on 2/26 and livewire in the field with the catch of the attacking Sophie Devine. Poonam Yadav struck in her first over as well, and the Indian bowling was so complete, Raj didn’t need the services of Harmanpreet, who was already nursing a finger injury. Even wicketkeeper Sushma Verma chipped in with a wonderful stumping and incessant, motivating chirping.

This was the collective effort one talks about in a team sport, built around individual brilliance. And it all came together for India at a time they needed it the most.

After the match , Raj called it a “perfect response” on Twitter.

In the end, it was the perfect storm for the White Ferns. There are only so many ways one can say a “do-or-die” or must-win match. Both teams knew the stakes, but not both could play them. Yes, New Zealand crumbled under pressure and didn’t give the level of fight expected of them. But this pressure was created by India’s tough batting and tight bowling, by the team that was supposed to go under first. In a match where few gave them a chance, India showed their immense is also tempered with temperament. In short, India showed that the importance of that phrase “Intent”.

With a difficult semi-final against Australia next, it is this deep-rooted intent that will power them as they try to ride the newfound momentum into the final.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.


In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.


Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.


The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.


The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.