Women's World Cup 2017

From struggling to soaring: Mithali-Krishnamurthy’s 108-run stand was audacious and stunning

Their partnership took only 78 balls and left New Zealand in a state of shock from which they never recovered.

Not again.

Big games are often decided on match-changing moments. So when India’s Deepti Sharma edged behind and New Zealand’s Rachel Priest took a stunning one-handed catch on Saturday in Derby, the moment seemed to have arrived…for New Zealand at least. Mithali Raj, batting at the other end after hitting another half-century, must have turned around and grimaced to herself, “Not again”.

It was all painfully familiar. Just a few days ago, she had scored a 114-ball 69 against Australia. On being questioned if she had batted too slowly, she had attributed it to the pressure on her since others did not stand up to be counted.

That seemed to be the general theme of India’s campaign in the tournament, apart from that first match against England. India constantly seemed to be playing within themselves. The intent was preservation, not attack. And despite good partnerships, they were getting substandard scores.

A special knock, a daring partnership

And here they were again. A steady 132-run partnership between Harmanpreet Kaur and the captain was being squandered away. Kaur and Sharma had been dismissed. The Kaur-Mithali stand had taken 162 balls. Mithali was playing a relatively faster compared to her knock against Australia – she was striking at a rate of around 61 – but at 154/4 with only 81 balls left in the innings, yet another middling score in the 200-225 range seemed to be looming for India.

We all know what happened. A typhoon named Veda Krishnamurthy hit the quaint Derby ground and left the Kiwis stunned and staggered. Counter-attack is often considered the best form of defence, but rarely, has the Indian women’s cricket team been so bold, so audacious and so incredibly daring.

Their partnership was 108 off 78 balls. Read that again, only 78 balls. A run rate of 8.3. A stunning run-rate, especially for a team which has, at times, struggled to score at more than four an over. Add to that, the fact that it came at a crucial time in the innings, a must-win match, a situation where India have struggled and the sheer bravado of that assault stands out.

Of course, Veda Krishnamurthy was the star. In women’s cricket, 70 runs off 45 balls is the kind of knock that doesn’t happen every day, and especially not from an Indian batter. And here’s an interesting statistic to put that into perspective: the 24-year-old’s strike rate of 155.55 is the second-highest by an Indian player in an innings of 50 or more runs in a women’s ODIs. That’s how rare this magical assault was.

Not just pure power

But this was a great partnership too and not only because of Krishnamurthy, though she undoubtedly played a big part. If she scored 67 out of the total 108 of that partnership, her partner at the other end, captain Mithali Raj, added 41 to the stand…off a very healthy 35 balls.

That is an important stat and it also, in a way, proved Raj right: when someone else took the onus, she took the opportunity to be more expressive and batted at over run-a-ball. When Krishnamurthy came in to bat, the captain was on 71 off 86 balls. Her much younger partner at the other end didn’t start off as breezily as she ended – Krishnamurthy hit only boundary in the first five overs she faced. But Raj let her settle in, scoring a boundary herself and rotating the strike.

And when the assault started from the 42nd over, she just sat back and enjoyed the show. Mindful of the special innings that Krishnamurthy was playing, Raj responded to every call for a second run to put her partner back on strike, while taking as many singles as she could. More importantly, she was ensuring that the momentum and the intensity never flagged – the Kiwi bowlers had no measure of relief and were running ragged.

It wasn’t just delightful cricket from the two – it was smart, innovative calculative batting at a time when India’s tournament was on the line and they were smarting from two heavy losses. While Krishnamurthy provided the fireworks, Mithali Raj kept providing the fuse. And when it exploded, New Zealand were so shocked that they slumped to a lowly 79 all out.

India now have a tough semi-final against Australia ahead. But the one thing they will take away from their thrashing of New Zealand is the importance of intent. And as Veda Krishnamurthy and Mithali Raj showed in Derby on Saturday, a little bit of intent can make you go from struggling to soaring in a matter of a few overs.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.


In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.


Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.


The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.


The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.