indian cricket

The Cricket Advisory Committee did only one job – and they failed spectacularly at that too

Sourav Ganguly, Sachin Tendulkar and VVS Laxman were tasked with appointing India’s next coach and messed it up spectacularly.

On June 1, 2015, the “Big Three” of Indian cricket came together in a move which had the potential to completely change the game in the country.

“The president of the BCCI, Mr Jagmohan Dalmiya, has nominated Mr Sachin Tendulkar, Mr Sourav Ganguly and Mr VVS Laxman as esteemed members of the Cricket Advisory Committee of the BCCI, with immediate effect,” were the first lines of that press release.

“Areas of immediate focus will be to provide guidance to our national team as we set out to enhance our performance on overseas engagements, provide direction to improve our talent pathway and take steps to strengthen domestic cricket to better prepare our players to handle the rigours of international cricket.”

“Legends” is a word that is thrown around loosely in cricket nowadays but no one could dispute its usage this time around. Together, the three of them have played 1308 international matches. Sourav Ganguly is widely considered among the greatest captains of Indian cricket, Sachin Tendulkar is perhaps the best cricketer to have ever played the game and VVS Laxman is an artist extraordinaire of the sort never seen before.

An unqualified failure

So when you have the combined wisdom of legends of this stature, there was an expectation that Indian cricket was in the very best of hands possible. A real belief that from an earlier era of skull-duggery, the Board of Control for Cricket in India would witness the dawn of a new era of professionalism. An era, where Indian cricket would finally be restructured from the bottom-up, that processes would be put in place and it would ultimately benefit in an administration of high excellence.

Five days after they were appointed, they had their first meeting and gave an initial set of recommendations. They suggested that a 30-strong pool of bowlers – 15 pace bowlers and 15 spinners – be identified and monitored over a four-year cycle. They also suggested that the number of India A tours be increased and proposed restructuring the National Cricket Academy into a High Performance Centre.

And then they waded into the cesspool which has been the Indian coaching position and never came out of it.

Where do we start? Ravi Shastri as team performance director or not? Anil Kumble or not? Virat Kohli or Kumble? Virender Sehwag or Shastri? Or Tom Moody? Batting coaches, bowing coaches, batting consultant, bowling consultant...the list is long and painful and hardly ever seems to stop.

And now more recently...their appointment of Rahul Dravid and Zaheer Khan as consultants, their tiff with the Committee of Administrators and then their subsequent angry letter.

The letter sent by the committee to the COA is quite unique for its tone and tenor. The CAC lashed out at suggestions that it had “exceeded its ambit” in the appointments of Dravid and Khan, fiercely defending themselves by saying that they had put “their heart and soul into the process” and were “pained and disappointed” to see the light in which they were portrayed in the media.

They finished the letter with the following: “The three of us have played our cricket with great integrity and we have brought this trait in fulfilling this important responsibility bestowed upon us by the BCCI”.

Fine words. Lofty ideals. But what have the CAC really done and is that all three of Indian cricket’s biggest legends have to offer?

What has the CAC really done?

First up, what is the end result? In the last two years, whenever the name of the CAC has come up, it’s only and always when something about appointing a new coach has come up. After their appointment and amid much rumour and speculation, they decided to continue with Ravi Shastri as team director in 2015. One year later, they went on another coach hunt, Ganguly had a very public spat with Shastri and then chose to go with Anil Kumble. Now, in 2017, they somehow remained blissfully unaware of the Kohli-Kumble rift, even as it rapidly unfolded. When faced with the task of choosing the coach again, they went and selected Shastri and complicated it even further by exceeding their briefs and appointing consultants for the head coach.

Ultimately, it’s not wrong to say that the only thing these “esteemed” members, as CAC appointees, did was appointing India’s coach and coaching staff. They had only one job and they messed it up spectacularly.

And in that case, you also have to question why they are given such an important job in the first place, when they have failed repeatedly at doing it? Of course, Sachin Tendulkar, Sourav Ganguly and VVS Laxman are all certified legends but just like in a cricket team, reputation can only do this much. There must be results and in the case of the CAC, the only result visible has been this entire coaching fiasco.

An argument can be made that there is work being done and much of it is not visible. Fine. But where is the effect of it? There is no record of how many meetings the committee has held, except when it comes to appointing a coach. No other recommendations have come from them (at least the BCCI hasn’t announced them) other than the ones in June 2015. In individual capacities, they have all been involved in various other activities.

The state of affairs has become so bad that it can be construed as a joke – one that will not leave you laughing. And amidst all the wrangling between the Committee of Administrators and the BCCI, it’s perhaps time to lay the blame at the door of who is responsible: the CAC.

But, will anyone dare to question the legends?

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Making two-wheelers less polluting to combat air pollution in India

Innovations focusing on two-wheelers can make a difference in facing the challenges brought about by climate change.

Two-wheelers are the lifeline of urban Asia, where they account for more than half of the vehicles owned in some countries. This trend is amply evident in India, where sales in the sub-category of mopeds alone rose 23% in 2016-17. In fact, one survey estimates that today one in every three Indian households owns a two-wheeler.

What explains the enduring popularity of two-wheelers? In one of the fastest growing economies in the world, two-wheeler ownership is a practical aspiration in small towns and rural areas, and a tactic to deal with choked roads in the bigger cities. Two-wheelers have also allowed more women to commute independently with the advent of gearless scooters and mopeds. Together, these factors have led to phenomenal growth in overall two-wheeler sales, which rose by 27.5% in the past five years, according to the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM). Indeed, the ICE 2016 360 survey says that two-wheelers are used by 37% of metropolitan commuters to reach work, and are owned by half the households in India’s bigger cities and developed rural areas.

Amid this exponential growth, experts have cautioned about two-wheelers’ role in compounding the impact of pollution. Largely ignored in measures to control vehicular pollution, experts say two-wheelers too need to be brought in the ambit of pollution control as they contribute across most factors determining vehicular pollution - engine technology, total number of vehicles, structure and age of vehicles and fuel quality. In fact, in major Indian cities, two-thirds of pollution load is due to two-wheelers. They give out 30% of the particulate matter load, 10 percentage points more than the contribution from cars. Additionally, 75% - 80% of the two-wheelers on the roads in some of the Asian cities have two-stroke engines which are more polluting.

The Bharat Stage (BS) emissions standards are set by the Indian government to regulate pollutants emitted by vehicles fitted with combustion engines. In April 2017, India’s ban of BS III certified vehicles in favour of the higher BS IV emission standards came into effect. By April 2020, India aims to leapfrog to the BS VI standards, being a signatory to Conference of Parties protocol on combating climate change. Over and above the BS VI norms target, the energy department has shown a clear commitment to move to an electric-only future for automobiles by 2030 with the announcement of the FAME scheme (Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Hybrid and Electric Vehicles in India).

The struggles of on-ground execution, though, remain herculean for automakers who are scrambling to upgrade engine technology in time to meet the deadlines for the next BS norms update. As compliance with BS VI would require changes in the engine system itself, it is being seen as one of the most mammoth R&D projects undertaken by the Indian automotive industry in recent times. Relative to BS IV, BS VI norms mandate a reduction of particulate matter by 82% and of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) by 68%.

Emission control in fuel based two-wheelers can be tackled on several fronts. Amongst post-emission solutions, catalytic converters are highly effective. Catalytic converters transform exhaust emissions into less harmful compounds. They can be especially effective in removing hydrocarbons, nitrous oxides and carbon monoxide from the exhaust.

At the engine level itself, engine oil additives are helpful in reducing emissions. Anti-wear additives, friction modifiers, high performance fuel additives and more lead to better performance, improved combustion and a longer engine life. The improvement in the engine’s efficiency as a result directly correlates to lesser emissions over time. Fuel economy of a vehicle is yet another factor that helps determine emissions. It can be optimised by light weighting, which lessens fuel consumption itself. Light weighting a vehicle by 10 pounds can result in a 10-15-pound reduction of carbon dioxide emissions each year. Polymer systems that can bear a lot of stress have emerged as reliable replacements for metals in automotive construction.

BASF, the pioneer of the first catalytic converter for automobiles, has been at the forefront of developing technology to help automakers comply with advancing emission norms while retaining vehicle performance and cost-efficiency. Its new state-of-the-art manufacturing facility at Mahindra World City near Chennai is equipped to develop a range of catalysts for diverse requirements, from high performance and recreational bikes to economy-oriented basic transportation. BASF also leverages its additives expertise to provide compounded lubricant solutions, such as antioxidants, anti-wear additives and corrosion inhibitors and more. At the manufacturing level, BASF’s R&D in engineered material systems has led to the development of innovative materials that are much lighter than metals, yet just as durable and strong. These can be used to manufacture mirror brackets, intake pipes, step holders, clutch covers, etc.

With innovative solutions on all fronts of automobile production, BASF has been successfully collaborating with various companies in making their vehicles emission compliant in the most cost-effective way. You can read more about BASF’s innovations in two-wheeler emission control here, lubricant solutions here and light weighting solutions here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of BASF and not by the Scroll editorial team.