India in Sri Lanka 2017

After Dhawan-Rahul onslaught, Sri Lanka’s spinners finally helped their side find some spine

The home side have been on the receiving end all series but despite missing some of their best players, they almost managed to bridge the gap to India on Day 1.

A day before this third Test, on Friday, India’s afternoon practice session had been washed out. Once the rain stopped and the sun came out, the grounds men at Pallekele International Cricket Stadium swung into action. Giving them instructions were chief selector Sanath Jayasuriya and senior members of the Sri Lankan team management. First the lush-green pitch was brushed, then mowed, shaved again and then brushed one final time as a bag full of grass was taken off. Left behind was a flat, batting beauty with a few cracks showing.

India duly won the toss and opted to bat. Shikhar Dhawan and KL Rahul put that advantage to good use, as the Lankan attack was steamrolled once again. The duo put on the highest opening stand on Lankan soil in Test cricket - 188 - beating a 24-year old record. The devil is in the detail herein. India raced to 50 before the 10th over was up, and they reached 100 off 107 balls. Rahul never got out of second gear and sleepwalked his way to another Test half-century. Dhawan, who spot in the Test side was under question a month ago, scored his second Test hundred in three innings, scoring at strike-rate of 96.74.

A new tactic?

You want to take a breather here and wonder. Maybe, just maybe, the Lankan bowlers and fielders wanted to stop for a moment and think out loud too. This young team has been chasing leather this whole series – India scored 600, 240/3 and 622/9 in three innings in Galle and SSC. They have batted for 321.5 overs, and been in the field for more – 344.1 overs – before this Test even began. At what point do you start considering alternative tactical ploys?

The underlying question is about the state of the pitch. Never mind where India ended up at stumps on day one, but the fact that Sri Lankan team management scrubbed grass clear off the pitch indicated a defensive outlook. It wasn’t in sync with what captain Dinesh Chandimal had said in the pre-match press conference about ‘going hard at India and working out a win against the world’s no.1 ranked side irrespective of the 2-0 score-line’.

While they were totally dependent on winning the toss in this third Test, Lanka’s strategy reeked of fear. Is it the fear of losing? Perhaps, for what is their best chance to beat this well-oiled Indian team? The answer, ask any Lankan fan, and he will name either a square turner or a raging green-top.

It was in 2015 that India were beaten in Galle on a pitch that turned from ball one. In that same series, the third Test at the SSC witnessed a proper green-top and barring Cheteshwar Pujara’s magnificent 145 not out, the rest of India’s strong batting line-up scored 167 runs.

So again, ask this question – what brings these two sides, divided by an ever-growing chasm in quality, on level pegging? The answer is in the wickets that are laid out, yet for the third Test running, this aspect was not factored in as Lanka went about chasing leather once again.

During the Champions Trophy in England, there was a lot of hullabaloo over how flat-tracks and lack of swing from the white ball meant that ODIs were quickly becoming monotonous. The same can be said of T20 cricket as well – during the IPL season, almost every alternate game feels like you have seen it before.

Test cricket may not be dying just yet, but based on the evidence of this series, different facets of the game need to be looked at in a bid to bring in some semblance of equality between two unmatched teams. For, this format needs more attention than either ODIs or T20s.

This, though, delves into a larger debate as to where Test cricket is really heading, and is down to obvious politicking. For players on the field of play, in the immediate scheme of things, it was about how to stop Indian batsmen from scoring and perhaps also get a wicket or two. As it happened, the two openers helped out in this bid.

Like a king

“If you bat like a king, then you should also get out like a king. You should not be dismissed like a soldier. If you have made runs aggressively, then you will get out that way too. We got out playing our shots,” said Dhawan after the day’s play. Lanka got a sniff when Dhawan and Rahul gave away their wickets, but the tactic from the Indian dressing room didn’t change.

This first-day pitch didn’t have any demons in it, yet the Indian batsmen were forced to be pensive in the footwork and two-minded in their approach to the spinners. The dismissals of Virat Kohli and Ajinkya Rahane are clear indicators of this. The skipper was trying again and again to reach the length of delivery from the spinners. And this is how he got out as well - trying to reach out and edging behind.

Rahane played all across the wrong line, going for the turn, when there was none to be had. Malinda Pushpakumara may not have reached Rangana Herath’s level yet, but through the SSC Test and on day one here, he has shown a great resolve to bowl consistently and hit one length. It is seen in his economy – 2.22 – whilst others were being taken for runs by the Indian batsmen.

Pushpakumara’s control allowed ‘chinaman’ Lakshan Sandakan to make a mark as well. Dhawan mentioned that his googly was tough to pick up, and using his variations, the leg-spinner made Cheteshwar Pujara’s stay in the middle very uncomfortable. The crux of day one in Pallekele was in these three dismissals. Sandakan and Pushpakumara gave away only 48 runs against these three middle-order batsmen, and sent all of them back to the pavilion.

Forget the pitch. Forget whatever has happened in this series thus far. For once, Sri Lanka almost bridged the gap to India and indeed came out on top.

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Putting the patient first - insights for hospitals to meet customer service expectations

These emerging solutions are a fine balance between technology and the human touch.

As customers become more vocal and assertive of their needs, their expectations are changing across industries. Consequently, customer service has gone from being a hygiene factor to actively influencing the customer’s choice of product or service. This trend is also being seen in the healthcare segment. Today good healthcare service is no longer defined by just qualified doctors and the quality of medical treatment offered. The overall ambience, convenience, hospitality and the warmth and friendliness of staff is becoming a crucial way for hospitals to differentiate themselves.

A study by the Deloitte Centre for Health Solutions in fact indicates that good patient experience is also excellent from a profitability point of view. The study, conducted in the US, analyzed the impact of hospital ratings by patients on overall margins and return on assets. It revealed that hospitals with high patient-reported experience scores have higher profitability. For instance, hospitals with ‘excellent’ consumer assessment scores between 2008 and 2014 had a net margin of 4.7 percent, on average, as compared to just 1.8 percent for hospitals with ‘low’ scores.

This clearly indicates that good customer service in hospitals boosts loyalty and goodwill as well as financial performance. Many healthcare service providers are thus putting their efforts behind: understanding constantly evolving customer expectations, solving long-standing problems in hospital management (such as long check-out times) and proactively offering a better experience by leveraging technology and human interface.

The evolving patient

Healthcare service customers, who comprise both the patient and his or her family and friends, are more exposed today to high standards of service across industries. As a result, hospitals are putting patient care right on top of their priorities. An example of this in action can be seen in the Sir Ganga Ram Hospital. In July 2015, the hospital launched a ‘Smart OPD’ system — an integrated mobile health system under which the entire medical ecosystem of the hospital was brought together on a digital app. Patients could use the app to book/reschedule doctor’s appointments and doctors could use it to access a patient’s medical history, write prescriptions and schedule appointments. To further aid the process, IT assistants were provided to help those uncomfortable with technology.

The need for such initiatives and the evolving nature of patient care were among the central themes of the recently concluded Abbott Hospital Leadership Summit. The speakers included pundits from marketing and customer relations along with leaders in the healthcare space.

Among them was the illustrious speaker Larry Hochman, a globally recognised name in customer service. According to Mr. Hochman, who has worked with British Airways and Air Miles, patients are rapidly evolving from passive recipients of treatment to active consumers who are evaluating their overall experience with a hospital on social media and creating a ‘word-of-mouth’ economy. He talks about this in the video below.


As the video says, with social media and other public platforms being available today to share experiences, hospitals need to ensure that every customer walks away with a good experience.

The promise gap

In his address, Mr. Hochman also spoke at length about the ‘promise gap’ — the difference between what a company promises to deliver and what it actually delivers. In the video given below, he explains the concept in detail. As the gap grows wider, the potential for customer dissatisfaction increases.


So how do hospitals differentiate themselves with this evolved set of customers? How do they ensure that the promise gap remains small? “You can create a unique value only through relationships, because that is something that is not manufactured. It is about people, it’s a human thing,” says Mr. Hochman in the video below.


As Mr. Hochman and others in the discussion panel point out, the key to delivering a good customer experience is to instil a culture of empathy and hospitality across the organisation. Whether it is small things like smiling at patients, educating them at every step about their illness or listening to them to understand their fears, every action needs to be geared towards making the customer feel that they made the correct decision by getting treated at that hospital. This is also why, Dr. Nandkumar Jairam, Chairman and Group Medical Director, Columbia Asia, talked about the need for hospitals to train and hire people with soft skills and qualities such as empathy and the ability to listen.

Striking the balance

Bridging the promise gap also involves a balance between technology and the human touch. Dr. Robert Pearl, Executive Director and CEO of The Permanente Medical Group, who also spoke at the event, wrote about the example of Dr. Devi Shetty’s Narayana Health Hospitals. He writes that their team of surgeons typically performs about 900 procedures a month which is equivalent to what most U.S. university hospitals do in a year. The hospitals employ cutting edge technology and other simple innovations to improve efficiency and patient care.

The insights gained from Narayana’s model show that while technology increases efficiency of processes, what really makes a difference to customers are the human touch-points. As Mr. Hochman says, “Human touch points matter more because there are less and less of them today and are therefore crucial to the whole customer experience.”


By putting customers at the core of their thinking, many hospitals have been able to apply innovative solutions to solve age old problems. For example, Max Healthcare, introduced paramedics on motorcycles to circumvent heavy traffic and respond faster to critical emergencies. While ambulances reach 30 minutes after a call, the motorcycles reach in just 17 minutes. In the first three months, two lives were saved because of this customer-centric innovation.

Hospitals are also looking at data and consumer research to identify consumer pain points. Rajit Mehta, the MD and CEO of Max Healthcare Institute, who was a panelist at the summit, spoke of the importance of data to understand patient needs. His organisation used consumer research to identify three critical areas that needed work - discharge and admission processes for IPD patients and wait-time for OPD patients. To improve wait-time, they incentivised people to book appointments online. They also installed digital kiosks where customers could punch in their details to get an appointment quickly.

These were just some of the insights on healthcare management gleaned from the Hospital Leadership Summit hosted by Abbott. In over 150 countries, Abbott is working with hospitals and healthcare professionals to improve the quality of health services.

To read more content on best practices for hospital leaders, visit Abbott’s Bringing Health to Life portal here.

This article was produced on behalf of Abbott by the marketing team and not by the editorial staff.