Table tennis

Asian Cup table tennis: China sweep gold and silver in the men’s as well as women’s singles

Lin Gaoyuan won gold in the men’s final, while Zhu Yuling emerged victorious in the women’s title clash.

Ahmedabad: For 22-year-old Lin Gaoyuan of China, matching his more celebrated compatriots has been a way of life since he took up professional table tennis. India, though, has been kind for the youngster. At 17, he announced his arrival by reaching the final of the World Junior Championships in Hyderabad.

Since then, the highly competitive nature of the sport has seen Gaoyuan struggle to challenge the top dogs. It all, though, changed on Sunday as he defeated world No 2 and compatriot Fan Zhedong in the final of the Asian Cup in Ahmedabad.

Zhedong, incidentally, is the same opponent he lost to in Hyderabad. As fate would have it, Gaoyuan, who was competing in his second-ever final after the Junior Championships, faced his old nemesis. The last five years seemed to have taught him a lot as the world No 29 exacted sweet revenge with a 11-7, 7-11, 11-4, 9-11, 11-5, 11-5 victory at The Arena by Transstadia.

Zhedong has had the better of Gaoyuan on multiple occasions in the past. In their previous encounter during the Chinese National Games, it was Zhedong, who once again had the better of his rival.

“I had a very good mindset and didn’t have too much of burden. I think I performed very well today in the match. I am very happy with my win,” said Gaoyuan after the match.

Keeping all his previous encounters with Zhedong in mind, Gaoyuan decided to approach Sunday’s final with extra caution and kept his rallies short.

Gaoyuan never gave Zhendong space to operate. The latter’s potent backhand was also restricted thanks to Gaoyuan’s pace and placement. “Of course, I changed my tactics and prepared a lot before the game. I watched Fan’s videos and executed my tactics accordingly during the game. I was very determined,” said Gaoyuan.

Talking about his transition from a runners-up finish in Hyderabad five years ago to an Asian Cup champion, Gaoyuan said, “Five years ago, the World Junior Championship was my last event in the juniors circuit. Since then, I competed in many events that included the World Senior Championships and Asian events and many ITTF World Tours which gave me a lot of experience.”

China’s dominance knows no bounds

While, Gaoyuan downed the much fancied Zhedong in the men’s final, in the women’s final, it was again an all Chinese affair.

World No 3 Zhu Yuling prevailed over her compatriot and defending champion Liu Shiwen, who is ranked No 4 in the world. The match went down to the wire with Yuling emerging victorious by a 6-11, 11-9, 11-8, 10-12, 11-7, 11-13, 11-6 margin.

It sealed another dominant performance by the Chinese at a prestigious table tennis event. In fact, since its inception in 1983, only five different countries have won the men’s title at the Asian Cup. China alone have won the men’s title 25 times. Since 2008, they have now won the title nine consecutive times.

So what does China do differently compared to other countries?

China’s coach Li Sun praised his contingent’s hard work during the preparations for the tournament. Crediting it for the secret behind the country’s continued success in the sport.

“This tournament is very important to us and it is a part of our plans. It is connected to the World Cup so we choose the best players to represent China,” Sun said. “Pressure is normal for us because everyone wants to beat the Chinese always. We practice hard and that is why we have many top players.”

For India coach Massimo Costantini, the secret to China’s dominance in the sport lies not just in practice, but in intent.

“For the last six years, China have the target of dominating the Olympics and because of that they dominate everything else,” Costantini said. “Japan have changed their policy since they got the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. Around 50 to 60 players from their countries are playing around the world as we speak.”

“They have a huge quantity in their cadet levels. They invest a lot of money in coaches, they send them abroad for training. Some Japanese coaches go to China to improve their understanding of the game. If I propose something like this to SAI, they will laugh at me,” Costantini added.


Women: Final: Zhu Yuling (CHN) bt Liu Shiwen (CHN) 6-11, 11-9, 11-8, 10-12, 11-7, 11-13, 11-6; Third Position: Kasumi Ishikawa (JPN) bt Miu Hirano (JPN) 9-11, 7-11, 11-9, 11-8, 11-3, 9-11, 11-8.

Men: Final: Lin Gaoyuan (CHN) bt Fan Zhendong (CHN) 11-7, 7-11, 11-4, 9-11, 11-5, 11-5; Third Position: Lee Sangsu (KOR) bt Chen Chien-An (TPE) 11-7, 11-7, 10-12, 11-3, 12-10.

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.


In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.


Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.


The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.


The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.